Tuesday, December 31, 2024
Spirituality through Horror
MY FUTURE RESOLUTIONS OF YEAR 2025!: THIS YEAR TO HOPE
My future resolutions! Yes! In these three phrases might be numerous judgements, numerous smirks and numerous interests and fascinations I might get.THIS YEAR TO HOPE! AND ALL YEARS TO HOPE!
Monday, December 30, 2024
FOR EVERY DROP EXISTS AN OCEAN!
Kya dukh hai, samandar ko bata bhi nahi sakta
Aansoo ki tarah aankh tak aa bhi nahi sakta
It means, the sorrow of the ocean is immense and inexpressible. It cannot even come to the eyes of the sad as a drop of tear.
The Drop's existence is illusionary. Actually, that is complementary to the property of being free. Freedom in its nature is so free that the thing that is free is also free to not be, to not even exist. The Drop might decide to just one day not be, just vaporize or anything, change forms.
Standing there at the cliff of a mountain, comes a random thought, what if I just jump and let go. This is a free man's statement. Then he gets scared. Agency kicks back. Insecurity kicks back. The man is now secure but unfree.
What if someday he jumps, and all his imaginations that he will hit the ground were false. He keeps falling. There is not base. No ground to fall on. Just an empty space to keep falling and falling and falling. How does it feel when you are in air, and you are falling. At that moment, regardless of the future, this loss of agency, this passivity is freedom.
Freedom is freedom from the false sense of agency of your own self. That is the paradox of agency. For being free, you need to have agency, you should "try" to be free, but freedom is in loss of even your own agency on yourself.
Often, when we talk of freedom, the catch phrase is, "Freedom to govern ourselves". That is to take your own agency in your own hands. But then comes the responsibility of taking care of this fragile soul, in the dreadful existence of life. This little child is taught a freedom which keeps him bound for the rest of his lives. Oh, this burden of taking care of your being, your life.
Oh, this man, who was once a child, is taught fear. Fear to protect your life. What is the fear? That death will hurt. And Life does not?
Why then Gorakh says, "Maro ae Jogi Maro, Maran Hai Meetha!"
Death, to not be, the ultimate freedom. Majaz writes,
“Zindagi Saaz De Rahi Hai Mujhe,
Sehr-o Aijaz De Rahi Hai Mujhe,
Aur Bahut Door Aasmanon Se,
Maut Aawaz De Rahi Hai Mujhe”
Death calls everyone, every second, that you decide to not die, you do not listen to your death. Some people listen. Some people listen only to death.
Actually, one of the secrets of life is the paradoxical nature of agency and loss of agency. Activity and passivity as we say.
Existence requires activity. An active man exists more. But, the flavor of existence is in the passivity, where you can feel life in its full force. Be it pain, suffering, pleasure, sadness, glory, sweetness, anything.
Any work, for starting it, requires activity, agency. You must sit and close your eyes, taking agency, to meditate. But meditation takes you to a place where your agency loses, you lose control, you experience momentary freedom. You read a book, and you start reading it, initially, you find it difficult to focus, but after some initial resistance, you lose yourself in that. Absorbed in it, is a person, who is now just a book reader. His whole personality, existence for that moment is lost in it. You see a pair of eyes, moving side to side, reading word to word and probably what's in between words, spaces.
Any work, from mundane to mundane, is mundane till the point there is agency left in the doer. The Doer needs agency to start it. But the agency is the fuel that ultimately gets exhausted in the combustion of the workforce, and then is the energy, the heat that the passive can enjoy.
After a point it seems like, the eyes are doing their job, the brain is doing its job of interpretation, and I am free to just sit and watch. What is happening? the door is reading a book; the writer is writing its blog, and I am looking at the writer of the blog.
It is like, the fingers are running by itself, the brain gives instructions, I look at myself as I look at someone else doing their job.
This, I have heard in some people's spiritual memoirs. Kumar Vishwas told this in an interview. This is supposed to be called "Anhad".
"Had", or boundaries, are what define life. What you can do and what you cannot is decided by your own self. This happens in gym, in front of you, is a 35 kgs dumbbell, ask yourself, can I do dumbbell press with two 35 kgs dumbbell, there will come a voice, no, you cannot. Who is this voice? Do not mistake it to be your own voice. This is the animal in you who wants to keep living. His survival instinct. I am not saying you should do it. I am saying, this is "had".
When you start pushing your limits, it becomes "behad". behad is the zone where dreams come true, physique is built, people become mature, strong, people become famous.
Then, a man when he keeps pushing his limits, behad, he continues for so long that there is now no more to push, this is anhad, when the body says, ok we got it. This is what you want to do. Let us do it for you. The mind says, ok this is the only thing you want to think about. Ok, let me do it.
The whole mind-body structure runs on autopilot. And the pilot, you, can now sit, enjoy, you feel at ease with everything. You do not get tired. The body knows that what it has to do. You are mostly absent from everywhere. You are inside, in your Mindspace, in the tranquility of life. In a way, you are now falling in blank space. and there is no fear that one day I will fall on ground.
Come back to the drop. You are the drop, It is your destiny to get immersed in the ocean and lose your self. But, the ocean also wishes to be a drop and keep on living. Now, there is nothing to worry about. Keep living as a drop, you are living the ocean's dream. One day, the drop will be able to live the drop's dream.
Sunday, December 29, 2024
TAO UPANISHAD: CHAPTER 3
If you over esteem great men, people become powerless.
If you overvalue possessions, people begin to steal.
The Master leads by emptying people’s minds and filling their cores, by weakening their ambition and toughening their resolve.
He helps people lose everything they know, everything they desire, and creates confusion in those who think that they know.
Practice not-doing, and everything will fall into place.
Ancient Texts were simple. Simple in the sense that they did not have any intricate counter-intuitive logic. The Thinker did not wish to surprise you with his wit, He, Buddha, Lao Tzu or anyone, never wished that he should leave an effect on your mind, they never wanted to impress you. Neither they wanted to express. Most of the times, they did not even want to speak about these things. They were forced, in a way, by other people to do that.
I write commentaries on them for a different reason. I really want to express myself through them. I really think that the wise men were as ordinary as us, and the way to live life with peace is very simple, so simple that we, intelligent species on earth, just overlook it thinking, "Oh! Life cannot be that simple".
This tendency of ours to over interpret life or make it a complex within our minds is part of the problem. If you wish to solve your personal dilemmas, first of all you need to really feel that it can be solved. I think without this feeling; you will just end up mystifying things for yourself or philosophizing.
เคฌเคคाเคจे เคตाเคฒे เคตเคนीं เคชเคฐ เคฌเคคाเคคे เคนैं เคฎंเค़िเคฒ
เคนเค़ाเคฐ เคฌाเคฐ เคเคนाँ เคธे เคुเค़เคฐ เคुเคा เคนूँ เคฎैं
~ Majaz
Let us start to observe what Lao Tzu knows and writes.
If you over esteem great men, people become powerless. Great men are those who understand the secret. The Mystery of existence. The dilemma is that the mystery exists, this is the extent to which it can be known. Anything further than that will be an exaggeration. If you know the mystery with certainty, then there is no mystery left for you.
It is a tendency of this world to start valuing great men too much. Nietzsche has said somewhere,
Every deep thinker is more afraid of being understood than of being misunderstood.
Saturday, December 28, 2024
WHAT DID I LEARN IN THIS WHOLE YEAR?
Hey, how you guys doing?
Some of you, who are not guys, women, I mean, complain that why I ask only guys about doing? Why not us women? To which I have two answers, One flirtatious, and other genuine.
Flirtatious answer is, Because Only men have to try to do their work, you women are champions, you just flow, and the work is done. If you think this flirt has any merit, do give me a text on WhatsApp or anywhere you like, we can flirt some more. ๐ ๐
Coming to the genuine answer, it is just a catch phrase, for me guys is the gender-neutral term, which includes genders across the spectrum. So, yeah, that is the reason, it is my Carryminati analog of "Toh kaise hain aap log?"
So, coming to the issue at hand, how was my 2024? Given that we are at the end of this year, It is only suitable to write something, however brief about how was this year for me? What did I learn? How my worldview shifted? And what I think ultimately, I will try to achieve in next year?
First of all, I discovered that how toxic I can be to some people? How much hatred I have for some people who are closely related to me. For example, My mother. When I started writing about my mother, I did not know that I could write this much and this worse. So, yeah, I was not empathetic to her. and I regret it. Everyone deserves empathy regardless of whatever they did in their lives. Maybe, I am currently at this phase, where I cannot respect her as a mother, because my issues are not at closure here. But, some day may be, and as the world is going, Future mothers are going to be worse, so may be in some 10 years down the line, I respect my mother more compared to the mothers of my own generation, who could be even worse bitches of their times. Do not get me wrong, I am not a misogynist, but I am not blind either. Bitches need to be called out. Lastly, I think, I empathize with my mother. I understand she also had her fair share of sufferings. And yeah, Maybe If she would not been my mother, My hatred would be lesser. This hatred of mine is an "Emotional bias". I will overcome this as well. Not for her, but for myself.
Secondly, and ironical enough, I discovered Spirituality. A solace that saved me from the turmoil and disasters of the world. As Osho says, "Sara jahaan usko giraane ki koshish mein laga raha, lekin jo tere naam se jud gaya, wo tir gaya!".
I found God. I found Osho. Actually, Osho is God to me. With all his flaws and foes, I am in love with the man. Saari duniya uski burai karti rahe, Mai andha hun uski bhakti mein. I am in his feet.
เคเคฌीเคฐ เคुเคค्เคคा เคฐाเคฎ เคा, เคฎुเคคिเคฏा เคฎेเคฐा เคจाเคँ।
เคเคฒै เคฐाเคฎ เคी เคेเคตเคก़ी, เคिเคค เคैंเคे เคคिเคค เคाเคँ॥
~ Chanakya
เคฎाเคฒा เคคिเคฒเค เคชเคนเคฐि เคฎเคจเคฎाเคจां, เคฒोเคเคจि เคฐांเคฎ เคिเคฒौเคจां เคांเคจा॥
เคฅोเคฐी เคญเคเคคि เคฌเคนुเคค เค เคนเคाเคฐा, เคเคธे เคญเคเคคा เคฎिเคฒै เค เคชाเคฐा॥
เคฒोเค เคเคนै เคเคฌीเคฐ เคฌौเคฐाเคจा, เคเคฌीเคฐा เคौ เคฎเคฐเคฎ เคฐांเคฎ เคญเคฒ เคांเคจां॥
Thursday, December 26, 2024
LET'S TALK
Hey, how are you people?
Today I am going to share with you people something tragic that happened to me. So, Our family has some ignorant financial habits. Like they will buy some local land just through a broker and many other local investments. The problem of these investments is that they are riskier than even shares because of the added risks of non-trustable people.
Likewise, my grandfather and my aunt invested in some random ass cryptocurrency through some broker who contacted my grandfather through some contacts. I warned my grandfather that this is not the way to invest anything. When you invest anything, you either read about it or contact a CA, someone who is professionally trained, who will of course charge some money, but who is obliged to do a good job otherwise, you can sue the man. That is how professionalism works. But that is the thing a middle-class man fears a lot, professionalism. He will trust his peers who can be just as ignorant as him but will never contact a CA, a doctor or any professional.
So, my aunt wanted her money back after some time. And the terms and conditions were that anytime you can withdraw your money. So, my aunt asked me to help to get her deposits and interests back. Now started this broker's dodging the guns.
He stopped taking calls, he started shouting, he started ignoring.
Days and months passed. My aunt wanted her money because of some construction work she was doing, and she was in need of urgent money.
Last month, he finally gave up and told us the process to withdraw. Even that took some patience on our part because he dodged so much, shouted at us why we are calling so much and most of all, he used to lie a lot. He at first, said call me after breakfast. We called. Then he said that he has not said to call after breakfast, but he had said that he would call after his breakfast is over. Then I asked him after how much time, he said, half an hour. So, I relaxed, I had to do some household chores, so I went to the market. He called instantly 5 minutes after. He shouted at both my aunt and me for not picking up the call and told us that he said he will call in 5 minutes and not half an hour.
We understood that this man is a broker by definition, that is a fraud. We kept out head and did finally what he said. Now comes the interesting part.
He told us to mail the crypto company from a mail different from the official mail given by the company. So, we did that. I clearly remember asking him that do we use the official mail? and he said, no, use an informal one. So, we obliged.
He finally also saw the mail screenshot and said, in 25 days, money will be transferred.
Cut to yesterday, when we called, he started making excuses from morning that there is a technical glitch. When we forced him, he started shouting again and said that I did not mail using the official mail and that is why the transfer did not happen.
Now, I don't know what to say. Like, I am not a kid who does not understand how to email someone? I have been on a professional workplace where official communication was done on email only. If you will tell me what exactly to do and on which mail, why would not I do that?
I told him in frustration, "What an unprofessional man you are? First of all, you do not communicate enough, all you do is vague promises and then you ignore calls and shout!".
To which, he said, "I understood what kind of child you are! This is what sanskaar your parents gave you, you are not accepting your fault, and you are arguing like a kid!".
Look, I was putting up with the nonsense of this guy for 3-4 months. It was not even my investments. I even told my grand pa and aunty not to invest and trust local people and especially on such frauds like crypto.
And now, this guy is saying I do not know how to email. and that my sanskaar is wrong and shit just because I called him unprofessional.
I shouted at him, "AND WHAT A FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT YOU ARE FOR SAYING THIS MOTHERFUCKER!"
He started shouting again but just after then I cut the call to catch my breath.
Then He calls my grandfather. He told him, "Sharma ji, Aapke ladke ne mujhe english mein gaali di hai! usko bata dijiye ki english aur hindi mein gaali ka ek hi matlab hota hai!".
I said, wow. I was thinking, why is he angry. Is it because I gave him gaali or because It was in English. You know Indian man always lives in a colonialism trauma. I think he was more upset because I said motherfucker and not madharchod.
I would have said madharchod if my grandfather would not have been there. I would have said, "Arey madharchod, toh tumko hindi mein sunnna hai toh hindi mein de dete hain na, bur ka baal, randi ka baccha, maaa ki chutt tumhari, gaand ke side se khol ke ulta kar denge ne maa ke laude tumko!".
Anyways, my grandfather told him to shut up and just give my aunt her money back. This time, he said, mail through official mail and we obliged, and he said, 10-15 din mein ho jayega.
Now, we got the mail checked through him so that he tells us clearly if there is a mistake in the mail.
I am still not in stable state. I will be once her money returns. Because this guy was one of the most non-trustable people I met.
So, what did I learn out of this experience:
1. It is so important to be financially educated. I think equally important to earn.
Earn money and then learn finance
2. Never take financial decisions through trust on peers but on professionals who charge money because now, the professional is liable to give you the service and if he failed, you could sue the professional in courts, but you cannot do that with peers.
3. I know I could have handled the situation better with more patience. I will not defend what I did. I regret my deeds. I should have said madharchod instead of motherfucker to that bastard.
jokes aside, all I was saying is when you are in this situation, the person who is conning you, might be a pro. He will not be affected by the gaali that you gave him maybe because he listens to them from his clients on a daily basis.
I will not say, do not give gaalis to them. DO give, but do not get yourself affected by it. Because he is thick skinned, you also be thick skinned. Life, as it is, is war because of these people. Do not shy away from the war of life.
I did not! and I learnt this much.
4. Everyone has to fight their own wars. Life is a garden for those who do not aim for anything. That is always an option. But, if you aim for something, pain, gaali, regret, guilt, are part of the outcomes. Do not shy away.
I promise, I would not have shied away from slapping the guy if he had said those things on my face.
เคเคฌ เคคเค เคฌोเค เคธंเคญाเคฒा เคाเค
เคฆ्เคตंเคฆ्เคต เคเคนां เคคเค เคชाเคฒा เคाเคเคฆूเคง เคीเคจ เคฌเค्เคों เคे เคฎुเค เคธे
เค्เคฏों เคจाเคों เคो เคชाเคฒा เคाเคเคฆोเคจों เคเคฐ เคฒिเคा เคนो เคญाเคฐเคค
เคธिเค्เคा เคตเคนी เคเคाเคฒा เคाเคเคคू เคญी เคนै เคฐाเคฃा เคा เคตंเคถเค
เคซेंเค เคเคนां เคคเค เคญाเคฒा เคाเคเคเคธ เคฌिเคเคก़ैเคฒ เคชเคก़ोเคธी เคो เคคो
เคซिเคฐ เคถीเคถे เคฎें เคขाเคฒा เคाเคเคคेเคฐे เคฎेเคฐे เคฆिเคฒ เคชเคฐ เคคाเคฒा
เคฐाเคฎ เคเคฐें เคฏे เคคाเคฒा เคाเคเคตाเคนिเคฆ เคे เคเคฐ เคฆीเคช เคเคฒे เคคो
เคฎंเคฆिเคฐ เคคเคฒเค เคเคाเคฒा เคाเคเคเคฌ เคคเค เคฌोเค เคธंเคญाเคฒा เคाเค
เคฏुเคฆ्เคง เคเคนां เคคเค เคाเคฒा เคाเคเคคू เคญी เคนै เคฐाเคฃा เคा เคตंเคถเค
เคซेंเค เคเคนां เคคเค เคญाเคฒा เคाเค!
Adios!
Wednesday, December 25, 2024
TAO UPANISHAD: THE EXISTENCE OF DUAL OPPOSITES
"When people see some things as beautiful, other things become ugly. When people see some things as good, other things become bad. Being and non-being create each other. Difficult and easy support each other. Long and short define each other. High and low depend on each other. Before and after following each other. Therefore, the Master acts without doing anything and teaches without saying anything. Things arise and she lets them come; things disappear, and she lets them go. She has but doesn’t possess, acts but doesn’t expect. When her work is done, she forgets it."
~ Chapter 2 Sutras
"To be or not to be" asks Shakespeare. It is not a good question to ask, Lao Tzu would have said. When Lao Tzu wrote, Being and non-being create each other, it is apparent that choosing one over the other will inevitably draw us near the other.
He gives examples of all those dual opposites that create each other. The Beautiful and ugly, good and bad, being and non-being, difficult and easy, long and short, high and low, before and after. The chronology of these dual opposites is worth noticing.
It begins by notions of Beauty and ugliness. Extremely perceptional and subjective. Even a layman can understand that "Beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder". But difficult is to outgrow the tendencies of the mind to create an objective perception of beauty and ugliness. This gives rise to a notion of the "Hermeneutic temptation".
I think, in our situations of sanity, we accept the fact that beauty and ugliness are products of what "we find beautiful" and what "we find ugly" rather than what "actually is". But then, Why the mind tries to make it sound like an objective truth? Why does the mind construct a logical paradigm, a sort of rationalization to justify our perceptions? For this, we might need to understand this nuance between a fact and an opinion.
The nature of facts and opinions seem mutually exclusive. What is a fact can derive opinions but is not itself an opinion and what is an opinion can be supported by facts but is not itself a fact. But wait, no opinionated person ever speaks apriori that "this is my opinion", rather, just speaks as if it is a fact. This phenomenon is based on the rationale that every opinion in the head of the opinion maker stays like a fact as long as it does not come in conflict with reality or comes in conflict with other contrary opinions. This paradoxical nature of opinion makes things dicey. What is a fact and what is an opinion?
Let us take an example. When the church said that the sun revolves around the earth, we can say it was their opinion. But their opinion was that time backed by narrow looking evidence in their heads. It seemed like sun revolves. Only when we found the ability to look beyond the geocentric perspective or gaze did we realize that the Earth revolves around the sun. But is it a fact? This is also an opinion based on the reference frame of observation. If we take seemingly stationary far stars as our reference frame, it seems that the sun is stationery and Earth revolves. But if there is not an absolute rest frame possible, everything is moving with respect to every other thing in this universe, what wrong were the churchmen who used to say that Sun revolves. They were not, were they?
It so happens, that Objectivity or factfulness, arises out of the common background which provides us with the platform of scientific and logical verification. To say that there is something universal, in the true sense of the word universal, about facts of the universe, is a fallacy.
Then comes the question, if everything is an opinion, then why the illusion of objectivity arises? This in my opinion, is due to Hermeneutic temptation. This temptation to explain each perceptionary observation by a logic. Human beings are never seen saying, "I am such a person that I find that person attractive". They always say, "She is attractive".
And they can enlist a number of reasons, physical features, emotional quotient etc. The thing is, we need to justify it through reason. It is as if we have a philosophical necessity to explain our desires. When Jesus was asked, why are you suffering? He replied with silence. Who is suffering? Are you really sure that I am suffering? How did you arrive at this decision in such a small span of time? In long runs, pain and pleasure change into each other. Jesus became God.
The thing is, we like to categorize. We like to classify. We like to make categories that creates out of it a logical structure comprehensible to our head. The birth of any discipline involves two steps: Building a logically coherent structure by selective inclusion of nuance and then legitimization through limited number of observations and illegitimizing all other counter-supporting arguments and facts.
When we identify beauty as beauty, it is implicit in our mind a background voice asking, then what is ugly? Just for reference, we identify that as ugly. Now, if we say, Life is beautiful, imagine how inaccurate that statement is. Is not what you consider ugly part of life? Why don't you say, "I am such a person that I find Life beautiful"? Because you do not understand to what extent your own desires and perceptions shape your view of reality. Whatever comes out of your mind is not objective truth.
The nomenclature of beauty involves a number of artificially created reference points of beauty and in comparison, to those references, we deem other things beautiful or ugly. But understand that the references of beauty in our heads are not axiomatically correct, they are not self-evident truths. They are just either fed to us as common sense or we create a common sense suitable to our desires.
Our desires play such a crucial role in how we see the world that to even know objectively without biases, ourselves, requires shedding of our preferences and desires.
As we progress, we find, the opposite duals that Lao tzu mentions, keep on becoming so called "Factual". Like: Good and bad, being nonbeing, difficult easy, long short, high low, before after. It can easily be shown through some deductive arguments that like beauty and ugliness, these duals are also subjective. So, we will not go in that.
Interesting is the word, "Therefore". "Therefore, the Master acts without doing anything and teaches without saying anything."
What a genius of him! How can you act without doing? How can you teach without saying anything? How can you act first of all if everything is a perception of your own desires and objectivity is a self-constructed mechanism to feel at ease with existence. How do you speak if whatever you speak, nothing describes the universe but talks instead about us. Like if someone says, The Earth revolves around the sun, all it tells is not about the motion of earth, rather about reference frame, that we find that the earth revolves.
So, we have two primary questions here. If objectivity is an agreed upon myth which on large scales of space and time proves wrong, then what is there to act upon or say? This is our first predicament.
Secondly, how does the master manage to act without doing or teach without saying anything?
This is for sure that I am not the master. ๐
Maybe I am, but I am explaining with the already understood realization that whatever I say will not be the truth as language itself is an ultimate hider.
It seems like the Master has left reason. Master is free from the obligations of explanations. Master does not need to explain the world and how things work. He observes them as them and does not utter a word. He does not judge the universe and its actions. He sees phenomenon as phenomenon as does not bother about the noumena. He lets the Universe has its secret.
Gradually, The Master knows the secret, which is inexpressible in any language. He abstains speaking it, but keeps it in his soul, in his heart. His body language speaks it, his eyes blink it, his heart pumps the secret. That is how he acts without doing.
Doing is when you try to exist. You strive to be. How did you decide that you already are not? Once you try to exist, you certify that you don't. That is why, anyone who tries to love, scares the other person and the other person thinks he hates. Anyone who tries to become an IAS, verifies that he is not. How do you know, you already are not? What makes an IAS? a certification of the Indian State? How does that certification help an IAS officer's day to day life? Nothing as such. You have to deal with administrative works when you are an aspirant and after you became IAS. So just exist as an aspirant or an IAS. Do not strive.
He teaches without saying anything. Saying is for those who cannot show. Their presence is mute. That is why they speak. Most of us speak not to express but to conceal our real selves.
Truth is something that you do not say. You be it. A woman becomes love in the face of it, when she is in one. Her smile, her happiness, her dance, everything reminds of love. A very happy man does not tell you that he is very happy. His laughter is the evidence. Act without doing. Teach without words.
Children are better. They learn from parent's deed rather parent's sayings. Then Parents' wonder why my ward does not listen to me. Because listening is not natural. Language is not natural to man. action is much more instinctual. If you want your child to become a reader of books, and you do not read any, I do not know what to tell you, he is not going to read any.
Even when we grow up, we tend to learn from deeds only. Language and opinions are just concealers. Someone says, I study for 12 hours a day. How will it inspire someone who is lazy? It will not. If the lazy man lives with the attentive one, now is the inspiration. Inspiration, learning, etc. does not require language and opinions. It is hard wired in us to learn. To express the learning is a modern educational phenomenon.
She does not possess, but she has it. Like a Train blanket. You have it, you use it, and you return it after you use it, and you leave the train. If you are a nice person, you will return it by folding it and keeping it as it is as it was before the usage.
"Jyun ki tyun" is the Sutra of the Master. He does not own resources given by nature. He takes care of it whatever comes under his trusteeship but never owns. He does not even own his own body. But he takes care of it, nurtures it, eats what is necessary, does not judge it when it has sexual urges, takes care like a caretaker and then returns it to the almighty.
Remember you have to return the Blanket to the authorities the next day you leave the train of life. Do not tear it. Do not wear it so that it gets crumbled. How will you do it? Take care of it. Be at ease with it.
Act without doing. Your existence should become your deed. Your breath should say your deed. Your heartbeat should reflect your deed. You become that deed. But not by doing, do not force. Act, as if in a play. And do not get attached to the social conditioning much. You are not a son, or a man, or anything for that matter. You are acting in a play. Do not show anger when actually angry. Go home, express it, see your own wrath, when it passes away, come back, and act out anger. This has two benefits,
This act of anger does not harm you.
Your work will get done, which you wanted to achieve through anger.
Is it actually necessary to be angry when you need to be angry? No, acting is sufficient. But it is that you cannot control. Come home. See your own acting it private, take a pillow. Cut it in half. eat it. Destroy it. Show its wrath to it. And then you will feel, you will see the thoughtless state, the state, which comes after the act is over. The backstage. You find it was not you. It might scare you. Is this you? Yes and no. It is your ego. not you. You are awareness of this ego.
That is why, people get scandalized when they see themselves masturbating in private and the rage with which they touch themselves, a ruthless animal. Is this who I am? Yes and no. This is your body reacting to a lot of retention of sexual urges. A fully satisfied man is never an animal. He is what a civilized man is. But the dilemma is we want the ends without the means. We want a civilized man without the process of civilization, freedom to be an animal is the means to civilization, this paradox is how you explain most of our psychoanalytic problems. The freedom to fall in an attempt to fly is the reason why a man in his adulthood does not just jump out of a building.
When the work is done, she forgets it. Do not classify, do not try to make a study out of life. Do not do distinctions. Do not try to remember it.
That leads us to the paradox of knowledge. The paradox of knowledge is, whatever is we understand fully, we forget it. Like, its form not its content. And Knowledge manifests itself as memory in this world, you are called knowledgeable when you remember it. Now, whatever you remember, remains in your head like an unresolved complex, a sort of psychological issue. Like mother issues, most of us have knowledge issues. The education system forced us to be memory machines. We are not allowed to forget.
Forget, Forgive. Forgetting is part of returning the blanket. Do you want to live with the memory of life when you are dead? When you turn into a stone and will not be able to move, do you want to keep on thinking how was it like to be alive? Move on! Moving on is the way in life.
Hope I have been clear. But if I have been clear, you will practice this. Non-action, Non-saying, Not classifying, not rationalizing. And it will require a lot of unlearning.
Mai aapke bheeter baithe paramatma ko pranaam karta hun! (I bow down to the god sitting within you!).
MY GRANDFATHER'S ECONOMIC POLICY: A SUBALTERN PIECE OF HISTORY
T he past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.” Leslie P. Hartley (1895-1972) Thought travels with a speed dif...

-
"I heard that it was ATC's fault." "Yes, it might be. Indians are like that, aren't they? Irresponsible pieces of ...
-
It is very essential for you to chant it first. Consider it my orthodoxy towards Buddhism, but when aesthetics is not attached to truth, i...
-
Your Question, My Question, Whose Question? Democracy, as it has developed itself in the recent centuries, has transformed from being a li...