IS YOUR THOUGHT PROCESS PREDICTABLE?

In the Last blog, I gave a hint on what would be the next blog about, by a picture, 

 In this picture, you can see apparently it is an irony how the all similar looking fellows are mocking the different looking "in formals" guy calling him a conformist. Although This hypocrisy of the woke culture and the obsession of being unique is the most recent thought process one can think of ( Yes, this is your capability memers, you can't think out of the box, you only go with the flow) , There was a philosopher named Hegel who saw this pattern before the birth of any memer I guess, and he tried to Explain it in his so called "Dialektik" or Dialectic . The question that  we are addressing in this blog is much more generalizing than this meme,  the question is "Is there any pattern between successive selections of beliefs? Can we say we are organisms with free will Or we are just programmed individuals who think systematically, always programmed to think differently within their own range?" 

By the way, He is Hegel ☝(was) 

EXPLAINING FREE WILL AND CULT CULTURE IN TERMS OF HEGEL'S DIALEKTIKS 

Dialectic is a way of speaking in which we talk in terms of three processes, viz. 

    1. Thesis 

     2. Anti-Thesis 

     3. Synthesis 

Hegel said that if we see historically, the thought processes toward cultures , politics and so on first begins with a thesis, which is the primary way of thinking about any topic. 

Then comes after a span of time, Anti-thesis, where a counter argument of why the present thought process is flawed and why Anti-thesis is the more correct way of thinking about the topic, comes into picture. Although both the thought processes are extremely radical in their own ways, at that time, the mass majority finds the new cult more progressive or more apt. Then there comes a third stage of synthesis where both the thought processes come to a balance and then we naturally progress towards a natural equilibrium. 

"YOU CAN FIND IMPORTANT PARTS OF YOURSELF IN HISTORY" 

~ HEGEL 

FRENCH REVOLUTION 

For example," In the 18th century France, where we first saw a revolution in 1789, the Monarchy was crushed by the working class, and new ideals like equality and freedom came into picture. 

If you are a Hegelian, you will ask, what the working class was thinking in 16th century? Because obviously, France was in the hands of Monarchs for a long time. Why they didn't think of these necessities before? Hegel argued that the Human consciousness takes time to build a new consensus or a new thought which in those days, were incomprehensible.

 Then, slowly and continuously, the masses got to know that they deserve freedom and all and then an Anti-thesis of Monarchy happened in 1789. But The Anti-thesis also went to an extremely radical outcome when Napoleon took over who was among the working class ( He came from a humble background) Who thought if a Non-descendent or a "Not a king" guy ruled the state, then it would be better. Here on this point, A Hegelian would have argued that why Napoleon couldn't sense the problem that might arise for the people in his regime? 

A Hegelian answer to that would be, the Anti-thesis and Thesis statements exist locally as the perfect solution to the problem at hand. 

Here we see, after the defeat of Napoleon, people accepted the conservative absolutism which sort of existed before Napoleon. Here we again revert back to The thesis, people saw the Salvation in previous system because they were fed up of Napoleon. This tug of war finally ended on a synthesis of both the ideas in a Democratic system where the working class rules in terms of voting, and the new class of rulers called politicians rule in terms of their work to serve the nation, which is obviously the best version of distribution of power till now. 

Now comes the important point, Can, by following this process of Dialectic, we predict what next thought process will be acceptable by the masses in majority? This is sort of predicting the future. And you know "Big data" 

Exists for the same purpose. They are literally  going to read your minds and decisions by using statistics and Hegel's Dialectics blah blah... But let's see... 

Hegel didn't say anything for that matter. His saying on this was simply "We can find important parts of ourselves in history".

But If we think a bit, we will find the approach of dialectic works on the assumption of local Blacks and whites (extremely radical solutions) but eventually the fate of this world is grey. A mixture of both the extremes. Now just after a food of thought, we can think that there also exists a binary between the radical approach and the slow progress or the grey approach. So, Just Following the Hegelian Dialectic, we can take a leap of faith to generalise that the after the synthesis of the two ideas, sometimes people may not get quenched by the synthesis of the two, and now they need a change again. Either they revert back to the old Antithesis or Thesis worlds for sometime or a basically null appears in the global scenario where nobody has any solution to the existing problemproblem till a new black or white appears and then following the same Hegelian approach. 

You can apply the Hegelian approach to almost anything. The feminist movement that you see, the mechanical life in a capitalist culture and the new woke culture that you see. 

So if we look at the meme again(to which you will not be able to laugh now, you never thought this meme was this serious, right?) 

Obviously the joke is on the woke idiots, who are all conformists with the idea of being woke and living a Bob Marley like life. But, wait a minute, If we apply Hegelian food of thought here, we can just explain that this guy in the formals is the new revolutionary of his time who will bring a new kind of Capitalistic woke culture where the life would not be too haphazard like the woke culture but also not too disciplined like a typical mechanical life in a purely Capitalistic regime. So instead of laughing, You should appreciate the philosophy here ( just kidding, please don't call me a woke, 😖) 

You should not think being a rebel always means to crash the system and not follow the rules, when everyone is not following the rules, you can be a revolutionary by following them. But obviously, one should not function just for the sake of being a revolutionary and so on. If breaking rules is the reality of your time, do it. It all depends on what you perceive as correct (obviously, you will be called an idiot by others and may be you are one!) 

 AS WE ARE ALL WOKE POSITIVE PEOPLE, WE WILL END THE DISCUSSION WITH SOMETHING POSITIVE(NONSENSE) 

WHY HEGEL NEVER GETS IN TROUBLE WHILE INTERACTING WITH NEW GIRLS AROUND HIM? 

BECAUSE HIS NAME IS A FUCKING START OF A CONVERSATION ( HEY GIRL) (SORRY 🙃) 

Next blog has it's illegal relations with this picture:- 

  

STAY TUNED, READ MORE (THERE'S NOTHING MORE REAL THAN A FICTION BOOK)